Monitoring and Metrics
The ability to monitor and measure what is going on is very important. Especially in a location transparent environment like an Axon application it is very important to be able to trace your message and check the ingestion rate of it.
Monitoring
Monitoring a message centric application will require you to be able to see where your messages are at a given point in time. This translates to being able to track your commands, events and queries from one component to another in an Axon application.
Correlation Data
One import aspect in regards to this is tracing a given message. To that end the framework provides the CorrelationDataProvider
, as described briefly here. This interface and its implementations provide you the means to populate the meta-data of your messages with specific fields, like a 'trace-id', 'correlation-id' or any other field you might be interested in.
For configuring the MessageOriginProvider
you can do the following:
Interceptor Logging
Another good approach to track the flow of messages throughout an Axon application is by setting up the right interceptors in your application.
There are two flavors of interceptors, the Dispatch and Handler Interceptors (as discussed here), which intercept a message prior to publishing (Dispatch Interceptor) or while it is being handled (Handler Interceptor). The interceptor mechanism lends itself quite nicely to introduce a way to consistently log when a message is being dispatched/handled. The LoggingInterceptor
is an out of the box solution to log any type of message to SLF4J, but also provides a simple overridable template to set up your own desired logging format. We refer to the command, event and query sections for the specifics on how to configure message interceptors.
Event Tracker Status
Since Tracking Tokens "track" the progress of a given Tracking Event Processor, they provide a sensible monitoring hook in any Axon application. Such a hook proves its usefulness when we want to rebuild our view model and we want to check when the processor has caught up with all the events.
To that end the TrackingEventProcessor
exposes the processingStatus()
method. It returns a map where the key is the segment identifier and the value is an "Event Tracker Status". The Event Tracker Status exposes a couple of metrics:
The
Segment
it reflects the status of.A boolean through
isCaughtUp()
specifying whether it is caught up with the Event Stream.A boolean through
isReplaying()
specifying whether the given Segment isA boolean through
isMerging()
specifying whether the given Segment isThe
TrackingToken
of the given Segment.A boolean through
isErrorState()
specifying whether the Segment is in an error state.An optional
Throwable
if the Event Tracker reached an error state.An optional
Long
throughgetCurrentPosition
defining the current position of theTrackingToken
.An optional
Long
throughgetResetPosition
defining the position at reset of theTrackingToken
.This field will be
null
in case theisReplaying()
returnsfalse
.It is possible to derive an estimated duration of replaying by comparing the current position with this field.
An optional
Long
throughmergeCompletedPosition()
defining the position on theTrackingToken
when merging will be completed.This field will be
null
in case theisMerging()
returnsfalse
.It is possible to derive an estimated duration of merging by comparing the current position with this field.
Metrics
Interesting metrics in a message centric system come in several forms and flavors, like count, capacity and latency for example. Axon Framework allows you to retrieve such measurements through the use of the axon-metrics
or axon-micrometer
module. With these modules you can register a number of MessageMonitor
implementations to your messaging components, like the CommandBus
, EventBus
, QueryBus
and EventProcessors
.
axon-metrics
module uses Dropwizard Metrics for registering the measurements correctly. That means that MessageMonitors
are registered against the Dropwizard MetricRegistry
.
axon-micrometer
module uses Micrometer which is a dimensional-first metrics collection facade whose aim is to allow you to time, count, and gauge your code with a vendor neutral API. That means that MessageMonitors
are registered against the Micrometer MeterRegistry
.
The following monitor implementations are currently provided:
CapacityMonitor
- Measures message capacity by keeping track of the total time spent on message handling compared to total time it is active.This returns a number between 0 and n number of threads. Thus, if there are 4 threads working, the maximum capacity is 4 if every thread is active 100% of the time.
EventProcessorLatencyMonitor
- Measures the difference in message timestamps between the last ingested and the last processed event message.MessageCountingMonitor
- Counts the number of ingested, successful, failed, ignored and processed messages.MessageTimerMonitor
- Keeps a timer for all successful, failed and ignored messages, as well as an overall timer for all three combined.PayloadTypeMessageMonitorWrapper
- A specialMessageMonitor
implementation which allows setting a monitor per message type instead of per message publishing/handling component.
You are free to configure any combination of MessageMonitors
through constructors on your messaging components, simply by using the Configuration API. The GlobalMetricRegistry
contained in the axon-metrics
and axon-micrometer
modules provides a set of sensible defaults per type of messaging component. The following example shows you how to configure default metrics for your message handling components:
Dropwizard
Micrometer
If you want to have more specific metrics on a message handling component like the CommandBus
, EventBus
(or more specifically TrackingEventProcessor
), you can do the following:
Last updated